From the archive: A further word on educational inequality

Laura McInerney /   April 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM 2,566 views

private school

Yesterday I explained why inaccurate use of the term “educational inequality” makes me uneasy. But then I started thinking about a gross educational inequality that is hardly ever mentioned, and it made me madder and madder.

Here is the school building that the teachers and pupils of Rugby School see when they arrive to learn:

KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

Here is the school building me and the pupils I taught saw:

school

Spot any differences?

Here is a corridor at Westminster School:

Westminster School by Ruggero Rossi (ruggaugga)) on 500px.com Westminster School by Ruggero Rossi

Here is the corridor my classroom was on. In one direction and then the other:

73_544435939219_597_n 73_544435949199_851_n

Yes the bucket was necessary for a roof leak.

Here is a classroom at the very expensive St. Paul’s School:

classroom

Here is the classroom I taught in during the second year (and a later year):

188_561178581829_2920_n 264830_902763712489_8009937_n

This second one looks great, until you realise that three of its wall are surrounded by the playground where students are doing PE, and it has a plastic roof which means if it’s raining you have to shout at 100 decibels before anyone can hear your instructions.

Here are the 45 acres of sporting fields that St Paul’s School in London has:

fields

Here’s the…oh wait…we don’t have any fields.

Here’s the library at St Paul’s Girls’ School:

library

Here’s the….oh no…wrong again. The library was taken over by the exclusion unit.

Here’s the drama studio at Eton which has a flying system, orchestra pit, revolving stage, make-up studios, a stocked wardrobe, dressing rooms, a full-time designer and a fleet of technical staff.

Our_Town_Moonc

Here’s our drama studio that had plants growing through the walls.

167774_759527299409_4252692_n

It did not have to be this way People often ask: Why didn’t the school look after its buildings better? It did. They ploughed thousands into keeping it together and resolving issues, but they almost invariably reared their head again and again because the school needed knocking down and redoing. In 2003, even Ofsted concurred, reporting in their inspection documents that the building had “reached the end of its useful life”.

The period I taught in was after this as the school waited patiently for a new site to become available. Then, when it did, the school was six weeks away from beginning its new BSF school and the money was cut. The site of the planned new build was given to a Free School. Only after a lengthy battle – which has meant the school has been in unsatisfactory condition for a decade – the school has finally been granted Priority Schools Build money and thankfully building works will start this summer even if progress is going to be slow.

But it doesn’t resolve the fact that THIS is educational inequality. Living in a country where some children spend 5 hours a day in freezing classrooms, with plastic leaking roofs and mould growing through walls while others are not just in ‘comfort’ but are fully surrounded by facilities beyond the imaginations of most is inequality of input – it is giving children a fundamentally different experience. Yet it’s never what I hear challenged, and it certainly isn’t going to be changed merely by ‘improving teacher quality’.

And if anyone tells you that “buildings don’t matter” or “kids in other countries learn in mud huts” then ask them if they want their child to grow up, day-in day-out, in horrible physical conditions. I’m fairly certain I know what the answer will be.

Courtesy of Laura McInerney

Sign-up for the Guerilla Daily newsletter – the best frontline and independent blogs every week day.

 

Please comment with your real name using good manners.

Leave a Reply