Two rules about clarity
[If you value independent and reliable law and policy blogging at Jack of Kent, please support this blog at its Patreon site – many thanks.]
12th July 2016
Prompted by the current debate over the Labour leadership rules, here are two rules about clarity.
First rule of clarity
To say “[x] is clear, it means [y]” means that [x] is not clear.
If [x] were clear, it would speak for itself without any gloss or explanation.
Second rule of clarity
If a thing is clear, it does not need any accompanying word.
For example, if a thing is clear then the accompanying words in each of the following would be redundant: “completely clear”, “absolutely clear”, “totally clear”, “crystal clear”.
For email alerts for my posts at Jack of Kent, the FT and elsewhere, please submit your email address in the “Subscribe” box on this page.
Regular blogging at Jack of Kent is made possible by the kind sponsorship of Hammicks Legal Information Services.
Please click on this link to Hammicks and have a browse.